[ensembl-dev] BioPerl version

[Fields, Christopher J]

Interesting.  So, we could technically release that module (Bio::Root::Storable) on it's own on CPAN and it should 'just work' for new and old bioperl versions, correct?

chris

On May 10, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Roy Storey <kiwiroy at gmail.com>
 wrote:

> We have the blastview script running on v69 with bioperl-live
> (bioperl-release-1-2-3) and bioperl-release-1-6-901 for the latest
> version of Bio::DB::Sam elsewhere in the ensweb environment. I just
> moved the bioperl-release-1-6-901 version Bio::Root::Storable sideways
> to get blastview functional again (blastview relies on the 1.2.3
> functionality of Bio::Root::Storable).
> 
> Roy
> 
> On 11/05/2013, at 2:44, "Youens-Clark, Ken" <kclark at cshl.edu> wrote:
> 
>> I have the v70 Ensembl BLAST code installed on a machine.  BioPerl 1.2.3 is linked in as the "bioperl-live" directory, but 1.6.9 is also installed into the standard Perl library.  I believe this is causing conflicts.  Which is the recommended version?
>> 
>> --
>> Ken Youens-Clark
>> kclark at cshl.edu
>> Ware Lab/CSHL/USDA-ARS
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list    Dev at ensembl.org
>> Posting guidelines and subscribe/unsubscribe info: http://lists.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>> Ensembl Blog: http://www.ensembl.info/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list    Dev at ensembl.org
> Posting guidelines and subscribe/unsubscribe info: http://lists.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> Ensembl Blog: http://www.ensembl.info/