[ensembl-dev] Dev Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1

Syed Hossain snhossain at ebi.ac.uk
Fri Jan 21 14:26:02 GMT 2022


On 2022-01-20 18:00, dev-request at ensembl.org wrote:
> Send Dev mailing list submissions to
> 	dev at ensembl.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://mail.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_ensembl.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	dev-request at ensembl.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	dev-owner at ensembl.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Dev digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Change in consequence and HGVSp between VEP v99 and v100
>       (Wallace Ko)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:02:47 +0800
> From: Wallace Ko <myko at l3-bioinfo.com>
> To: Ensembl developers list <dev at ensembl.org>
> Subject: [ensembl-dev] Change in consequence and HGVSp between VEP v99
> 	and v100
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAMsJki0yY4PZG7sSYiNx-SkifAXrVcFsURgMKsZ3Q4Gz7ta_xg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Hello Ensembl Team,
> 
> During re-evaluation of some old samples, we found that VEP v99 and 
> v100
> give the same HGVSc, but different annotation, including consequence 
> and
> HGVSp, e.g.:
> 
>    1. HGVSc: NM_001034954.1:c.182T>C
>       - v99:
>          - HGVSp: NP_001030126.1:p.Pro61=
>          - Consequence: synonymous_variant
>       - v100:
>          - HGVSp: NP_001030126.1:p.Leu61Pro
>          - Consequence: missense_variant
>       2. HGVSc: NM_000283.3:c.928-9_940dup
>    - v99 HGVSp:  NP_000274.2:p.Tyr314CysfsTer50
>       - v100 HGVSp:  -
>    3. HGVSc: NM_001040108.1:c.4243-36_4243-1dup
>       - v99 HGVSp:
>        
> NP_001035197.1:p.Gln1414_Ile1415insHisIleAlaAsnTerSerTyrSerPhePheProTer
>       - v100 HGVSp:  NP_001035197.1:p.Gln1414_Ile1415insHisIleAlaAsnTer
> 
> I tried using offline VEP v100 with v99 cache and vice versa. VEP v100
> produces the new results regardless of the cache being used. So it 
> should
> be due to code change instead of data update.
> 
> The change is sort of significant but there seem no relevant details in 
> the
> release descriptions (
> https://github.com/Ensembl/ensembl-vep/releases?q=release%2F100) or the
> mail list about the change.
> 
> I wonder what causes such changes and if there is a scope or pattern on 
> the
> changes. Otherwise, we may need to re-analyze all results from VEP v99 
> or
> older.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Regards,
> Wallace Ko
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://mail.ensembl.org/pipermail/dev_ensembl.org/attachments/20220120/011e8c23/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list    Dev at ensembl.org
> Posting guidelines and subscribe/unsubscribe info:
> https://lists.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_ensembl.org
> Ensembl Blog: http://www.ensembl.info/
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Dev Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1
> **********************************

Hello Wallace,

Thank you for reporting this issue. But, unfortunately, we were unable 
to reproduce it.

For our case VEP v99 is also giving the same output as what you get for 
VEP v100 (i.e - HGVSc: NM_001034954.1:c.182T>C --> HGVSp: 
NP_001030126.1:p.Leu61Pro).

Can you kindly share the full command you are using and (if possible) 
the input files.

Best regards,
Nakib



More information about the Dev mailing list