[ensembl-dev] Inconsistent RefSeq coding HGVS in VEP
Sarah Hunt
seh at ebi.ac.uk
Thu Feb 1 10:32:05 GMT 2018
Hi Wallace,
RefSeq transcripts occasionally differ from the genome assembly
sequence. We calculate HGVS based on the reference assembly, so in a
small number of cases, discrepancies can arise
This is particularly an issue for GRCh37 as many rare reference alleles
have been replaced in the creation of GRCh38. If you look at the results
for rs9332964/ NC_000002.12:g.31529325C>T on GRCh38, you will see the
predicted HGVS is NM_000348.3:c.680G>A, as you would expect.
We have recently started taking alignments NCBI provide into account
when calling consequences on RefSeq sequences, and plan to update VEP to
use these alignments in HGVS creation, though this will not be a quick
process.
Best wishes,
Sarah
On 01/02/2018 03:59, Wallace Ko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For the variant NC_000002.11:g.31754395C>T, VEP GRCh37 gives HGVSc of
> NM_000348.3:c.679G>A
> <http://grch37.rest.ensembl.org/vep/human/hgvs/NC_000002.11:g.31754395C%3ET?content-type=application/json&refseq=1&hgvs=1> (rs9332964).
>
> By searching dbSNP, we can see that GRCh38 HGVS of rs9332964
> is NC_000002.12:g.31529325C>T and VEP GRCh38 gives HGVSc of
> NM_000348.3:c.680G>A
> <http://rest.ensembl.org/vep/human/hgvs/NC_000002.12:g.31529325C%3ET?content-type=application/json&refseq=1&hgvs=1>.
>
> Searching ClinVar, NM_000348.3:c.680G>A gives result that correspond
> to NC_000002.11:g.31754395C>T while NM_000348.3:c.679G>A doesn't.
>
> Querying NM_000348.3:c.679G>A in Mutalyzer Name Checker
> <https://mutalyzer.nl/name-checker?description=NM_000348.3%3Ac.679G%3EA>,
> an error is shown that the reference base should be C instead of G.
> This make me wonder if the HGVSc from VEP GRCH37 is incorrect.
>
> Regards,
> Wallace Ko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list Dev at ensembl.org
> Posting guidelines and subscribe/unsubscribe info: http://lists.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> Ensembl Blog: http://www.ensembl.info/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ensembl.org/pipermail/dev_ensembl.org/attachments/20180201/7765e3a1/attachment.html>
More information about the Dev
mailing list