[ensembl-dev] mupltiple (superfluous) ensembl gene IDs for single gene
Matthew Laird
lairdm at ebi.ac.uk
Thu Jun 23 10:28:29 BST 2016
Hello Jason,
Due to how multiple sources are used to annotate entries in Ensembl,
these sort of situations can occur. I've spoken to the gene build team
and they are aware of the overlapping transcripts causing this duplicate
naming. It's too late for the upcoming 85 release but this will be
corrected for the 86 release due out at the end of summer. Please let us
know if you have any further questions or concerns.
On 23/06/16 03:57, Jason Merkin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that SERPINA3 has two distinct ensembl gene
> IDs: ENSG00000273259 and ENSG00000196136.
>
> They overlap in the genome and the transcript summary shows them
> having the same CCDS, CCDS32150, and a Uniprot ID in common, but they
> share no transcripts:
>
> http://uswest.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Gene/Idhistory?g=ENSG00000196136;r=14:94612384-94624055
> http://uswest.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Gene/Idhistory?db=core;g=ENSG00000273259;r=14:94592058-94624646
>
> The gene id histories show that ENSG00000273259.2 was introduced in
> release 74. Is this a bug, or am I missing something about this gene?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list Dev at ensembl.org
> Posting guidelines and subscribe/unsubscribe info: http://lists.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> Ensembl Blog: http://www.ensembl.info/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ensembl.org/pipermail/dev_ensembl.org/attachments/20160623/f560ef3c/attachment.html>
More information about the Dev
mailing list