[ensembl-dev] No consequence for variant

Sebastian Ginzel sginze2s at inf.h-brs.de
Tue Feb 9 10:22:51 GMT 2016


Hi Will,

thanks for your explanation.

Do you have any suggestion how to filter these variants before processing?
Because VEP fails and stops annotating the rest of the VCF.


Regards,
Sebastian

> Hi Sebastian,
>
> In some cases when using the RefSeq transcript cache, the mappings we are
> provided by NCBI for a particular transcript may cause issues.
>
> In this case our database contains duplicate entries for NM_001271893.1,
> one of which is marked as a protein coding transcript but has no defined
> CDS. Your variant overlaps this duplicate, and because of the conflicting
> definition the VEP doesn't know what to call the variant and a warning is
> given on STDERR and in the warnings file.
>
> I would consider it safe to filter out or ignore any cases where we are
> unable to assign a consequence type such as this as they typically
> correspond to transcript annotations that are faulty to begin with.
>
> Regards
>
> Will McLaren
> Ensembl Variation
>
> On 3 February 2016 at 14:07, Sebastian Ginzel <sginze2s at inf.h-brs.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ensembl,
>>
>> I am trying to annotate a variant using VEP v83 with the
>> homo_sapiens_merged cache.
>>
>> When I reach this variant in my VCF file:
>> 2    239832097    .    A    T    100    PASS    .    .    .
>>
>> VEP fails with:
>> Can't call method "rank" on an undefined value at
>> /path/to/vep/Bio/EnsEMBL/Variation/Utils/VEP.pm line 1975
>>
>> The function vf_to_consequnces returns '?' as a consequence for this
>> variant.
>>
>> I have taken the liberty to attach the Data::Dumper output for a couple of
>> relevant variables as well as the parameters used to call the VEP script.
>>
>> When looking at the result of vf_to_consequences it seems that the Codons
>> and Amino_acids fields are undefined (line 98 & 100), although the variant
>> is predicted protein_coding (line 85).
>>
>> I got the same error for variants up- and downstream of that location.
>>
>> Can anyone confirm this? And if so: has an idea on how to fix it?
>>
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Sebastian Ginzel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list    Dev at ensembl.org
>> Posting guidelines and subscribe/unsubscribe info:
>> http://lists.ensembl.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>> Ensembl Blog: http://www.ensembl.info/
>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ensembl.org/pipermail/dev_ensembl.org/attachments/20160209/67c6f4d4/attachment.html>


More information about the Dev mailing list