[ensembl-dev] Variant Consequence Predictor
Stuart Meacham
sm766 at cam.ac.uk
Fri Feb 25 10:32:32 GMT 2011
On 25/02/11 10:26, Laura Clarke wrote:
> The dbsnp page for this site would suggest this is a strand issue
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?searchType=adhoc_search&type=rs&rs=rs79525962
> ss126705640 1000GENOMES|SRP_031_6362630_chr11_76049066 byFreq fwd/B C/T ggttgagccgctgcaggctggccagattgg aaaggtgtatgggggcaggtcccgcagggc 04/18/09 03/08/10 131 Genomic unknown
> ss161043141 ILLUMINA|HumanOmni1-Quad_v1-0_B_SNP11-76049066-128_T_R_1587991382 rev/T A/G gccctgcgggacctgcccccatacaccttt ccaatctggccagcctgcagcggctcaacc 08/04/09 10/05/09 131 Genomic unknown
> ss168944051 ILLUMINA|Human1M-Duov3_B_GA010171-0_T_R_1533432755 rev/T A/G gccctgcgggacctgcccccatacaccttt ccaatctggccagcctgcagcggctcaacc 10/01/09 10/01/09 132 Genomic unknown
> ss202899005 BUSHMAN|BUSHMAN-chr11-76049065 fwd/ C/G ggttgagccgctgcaggctggccagattgg aaaggtgtatgggggcaggtcccgcagggc 02/16/10 03/08/10 132 Genomic unknown
> ss235617451 1000GENOMES|pilot_1_CEU_5222080_chr11_76049066 fwd/ C/T ggttgagccgctgcaggctggccagattgg aaaggtgtatgggggcaggtcccgcagggc 05/01/10 05/01/10 132 Genomic unknown
> ss242238239 1000GENOMES|pilot_1_CHB+JPT_4123316_chr11_76049066 fwd/ C/T ggttgagccgctgcaggctggccagattgg aaaggtgtatgggggcaggtcccgcagggc 05/01/10 05/01
>
> The C/T ss ids are all forward strand but the A/G ones are reverse strand
>
> The transcript itself is on the reverse strand
>
> http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Transcript/Summary?db=core;g=ENSG00000137507;r=11:76368568-76381791;t=ENST00000260061;v=rs79525962;vdb=variation;vf=1164142
>
> which means for the transcript the correct consequence is
> rs79525962 407 C T A/P NON_SYNONYMOUS_CODING
Does this mean that when passed a VCF any consequence prediction for a
Transcript on the reverse strand is possibly incorrect!? This would be
misleading as the script actually returns the transcript on which the
SNP and consequence are predicted to effect . . .
Stuart
More information about the Dev
mailing list