[ensembl-dev] VEP 111 is not giving standardised HGVS
Wallace Ko
myko at l3-bioinfo.com
Tue Feb 27 03:52:40 GMT 2024
Hello Ensembl Team,
For the variant 17-50199255-C-CG, VEP 104 is
giving ENST00000225964.10:c.441dup which is expected. On the other hand,
VEP 111 gives ENST00000225964.10:c.441_442insC.
Per HGVS Nomenclature Recommendations
<https://hgvs-nomenclature.org/stable/recommendations/general/>: when a
variant can be described as a duplication or an insertion, prioritisation
determines it should be described as a duplication. Therefore the HGVSc
from VEP 104 should be the preferred representation.
Regards,
Wallace Ko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ensembl.org/pipermail/dev_ensembl.org/attachments/20240227/952aec67/attachment.html>
More information about the Dev
mailing list