[ensembl-dev] Strange positions on chrY in homo_sapiens_otherfeatures_96_38
Jerome Roy
jerome at wuxinextcode.com
Thu Oct 31 14:25:16 GMT 2019
Hi,
I am (still) looking at refseq data in the mysql database and found strange positions for chrY:
for example, looking at the TTTY3 gene I'm expecting the start to be at 25,728,490 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/114760)
But I don't get this position for ensembl 96/97/98:
With ensembl95:
> select seq_region_id,seq_region_start,seq_region_end,description from homo_sapiens_otherfeatures_95_38.gene where description like '%114760%';
+---------------+------------------+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| seq_region_id | seq_region_start | seq_region_end | description |
+---------------+------------------+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 131553 | 25728490 | 25733388 | testis-specific transcript, Y-linked 3 (non-protein coding) [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:114760] |
+---------------+------------------+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
With ensembl96:
> select seq_region_id,seq_region_start,seq_region_end,description from homo_sapiens_otherfeatures_96_38.gene where description like '%114760%';
+---------------+------------------+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| seq_region_id | seq_region_start | seq_region_end | description |
+---------------+------------------+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 131553 | 82945905 | 82950803 | testis-specific transcript, Y-linked 3 [Source:NCBI gene;Acc:114760] |
+---------------+------------------+----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
I don't get why this position has changed to 82,945,905.
The position in homo_sapiens_core_95_38 has not changed.
I get the same for all genes I looked at, they are all above position 60,184,233.
Is this related to changes in refseq data handling in ensembl96?
Thanks
Best regards,
--
Jerome Roy
WuXiNextCODE
https://www.wuxinextcode.com/
More information about the Dev
mailing list