[ensembl-dev] Surprising CCDS schema versions: mismatches with the version in the database name.

[Jeremy Henty]

Daniel Barrell wrote:

> Occasionally, a database has been patched when a significant schema
> change means it will not work with the code release it is intended
> for, hence the discrepancy in human 73. However, I need to look into
> why release 74 uses schema 72, it may need to be patched up.

What did you find?  We are always keen to use the latest CCDS release
but if it's an old (and possibly incompatible) schema version then we
have to hold back, which is a shame.

Jeremy Henty
Anacode Team